As e-commerce businesses grow, fulfillment often becomes a crossroads.
What once worked—packing orders in-house, managing inventory manually, hiring seasonal help—can start to strain teams, budgets, and customer experience.
At that point, many brands face a key decision: continue fulfilling orders in-house, or partner with a third-party logistics provider (3PL)?
The right answer depends on your business model, growth rate, and priorities. This guide breaks down the tradeoffs across cost, control, and scalability to help you make an informed decision. If you're already experiencing fulfillment challenges, you may want to read our guide on when to move to a 3PL.
In-house fulfillment means your business manages all logistics operations internally. You control the warehouse space, hire and train staff, purchase packing materials, manage shipping, and handle returns yourself.
This model is common for:
A third-party logistics provider (3PL) handles fulfillment operations on your behalf. Inventory is stored in their warehouse(s), and they manage picking, packing, shipping, and often returns. 3PLs leverage economies of scale, advanced warehouse management systems (WMS), and established carrier relationships to provide efficient fulfillment services.
3PLs are typically used by:
In-house fulfillment often feels cheaper at first because costs are familiar and incremental. Over time, however, many costs are fixed and less flexible. Industry data shows that in-house fulfillment typically costs $4-7 per order at low volumes, but this can increase to $8-12+ per order as complexity and volume grow due to inefficiencies.
Common in-house costs include:
As volume grows, these costs don't always scale cleanly. Hiring, training, and expanding space often happen in large steps, not small increments. Many brands find that costs per order actually increase during growth periods due to operational stress and the need for additional infrastructure before it's fully utilized.
3PL pricing is usually variable and usage-based, which means you pay for what you use rather than maintaining fixed infrastructure. Industry-standard 3PL costs typically range from $3-8 per order depending on order complexity, plus storage and receiving fees.
Typical 3PL fees include:
While per-order fees may appear higher than internal costs on paper, many brands find that total fulfillment cost becomes more predictable and scalable as volume changes. The transparency of 3PL pricing also makes it easier to forecast costs and identify optimization opportunities.
Key difference:
| Factor | In-House Fulfillment | 3PL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost structure | Mostly fixed | Mostly variable |
| Predictability | Lower during growth | Higher at scale |
| Capital investment | Required | Minimal |
| Shipping rates | Often higher | Often discounted |
The biggest advantage of in-house fulfillment is direct control over every aspect of operations. You can make immediate changes without coordinating with external partners or waiting for contract modifications.
You control:
This level of control can be valuable for brands with highly customized packaging, rapid process changes, or very specialized handling needs that require immediate adaptation.
Important consideration: Control also means full responsibility for mistakes, staffing gaps, and operational risk. When issues arise—whether from employee turnover, equipment failures, or peak season overload—you bear the full cost and impact.
With a 3PL, day-to-day fulfillment is outsourced, but control doesn't disappear—it changes form. Instead of direct operational control, you maintain strategic control through defined processes, performance metrics, and contractual agreements.
Brands typically retain control through:
The tradeoff is less immediacy—changes may require coordination and implementation time—but you gain consistency and reliability, especially as order volume grows. Professional 3PLs bring expertise in process optimization and quality control that can exceed what many brands achieve in-house.
| Factor | In-House | 3PL |
|---|---|---|
| Daily operations | Full control | Shared control |
| Process flexibility | High | Structured |
| Accountability | Internal | Contractual |
| Risk exposure | High | Shared |
Scaling internally often introduces friction that can slow growth and increase costs. Most in-house operations are designed for steady-state volume, making sudden growth or seasonal spikes challenging to manage efficiently.
Growth rarely happens in a straight line, and in-house operations are often built for average volume—not peaks. This mismatch means you're either over-investing in capacity you don't need most of the year, or struggling to meet demand during busy periods.
3PLs are designed for scale. Their infrastructure, labor models, and systems are built to absorb fluctuations efficiently. Professional 3PLs typically maintain 20-30% excess capacity to handle volume spikes without service degradation.
This allows brands to:
For many brands, scalability—not cost—is the tipping point. The ability to handle 3-5x volume fluctuations without operational disruption or capital investment often outweighs the per-order cost difference.
| Factor | In-House | 3PL |
|---|---|---|
| Peak season readiness | Limited | High |
| Geographic expansion | Complex | Built-in |
| Volume fluctuations | Stressful | Absorbed |
| Growth friction | High | Lower |
In-house fulfillment may be the right choice if your business model aligns with these characteristics:
A 3PL is often a strong fit when your business priorities align with these factors:
The decision isn't simply "which is cheaper?"
A better question is:
Where does your business create the most value—and where does fulfillment fit into that?
For some brands, fulfillment is a core competency.
For others, it's a critical operation best handled by a specialized partner.
In-house fulfillment and 3PL partnerships can both work—but they serve different stages and priorities.
As e-commerce businesses scale, the tradeoffs around cost structure, control, and scalability become more pronounced. Understanding these differences upfront helps avoid painful transitions later and ensures fulfillment supports growth instead of limiting it. If you're expanding into multiple sales channels, consider how B2B and D2C fulfillment differ and how a unified 3PL can handle both. Once you've decided a 3PL is right for you, use our guide on what to look for in a 3PL to evaluate potential partners.
The choice between in-house and 3PL isn't just about cost—it's about where your business creates the most value. Talk with a BlueWave consultant to assess your 3PL needs, evaluate cost structure, control tradeoffs, and scalability requirements to determine which model fits your growth stage and priorities.
Learn how BlueWave can meet your fulfillment needs with a personalized analysis of your options and costs.
Request a Call with a Sales Consultant